Menu

The significance of portal vein embolization in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases

P. ZBORIL, K. VYSLOUZIL, I. KLEMENTA, P. SKALICKY, K. VOMACKOVA, M. CERNA, K. CWIERTKA

Abstract:

The first aim of the present paper was to evaluate hypertrophy of liver parenchyma after portal vein embolization in patients after systemic chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma metastases and planned extensive liver resections. The second aim was to study whether hypertrophy of the liver parenchyma remnant after could influence the postoperative course large liver resections in long-term chemotherapy within complex therapy of colorectal carcinoma.The prospective study comprised of 43 patients with colorectal hepatic metastases in whom liver resections of 4-5 segments were planned (Table 1). All patients underwent complex therapy of colorectal carcinoma, including chemotherapy consisting of 6-12 therapeutic cycles. Time interval between chemotherapy and liver resection was 2-24 months (mean interval of 8 months). Twenty patients whose presumed liver parenchyma remnant was less than 40% of total liver volume were indicated for portal vein embolization (mean liver parenchyma remnant of 29%). This was always embolization of the right portal branch. Twenty-three patients were primarily indicated to liver resection. Results: Hypertrophy of the left liver lobe occurred in all 20 patients. After portal vein embolization, the volume of left liver increased on average from 476 ml (282-754) to 584 ml (380-892) (P The values of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GMT) were lower in patients after portal vein embolization (P Significant differences were in postoperative level of serum bilirubin, bilirubin levels in patients after portal vein embolization were 2-3 times lower than in the group of patients after immediate surgery (P he values of prothrombin time were also significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery without previous portal vein embolization (P

Issue: 2/2012

Volume: 2012

Pages: 175 — 182

DOI: 10.4149/neo_2012_023

Pubmed

Shopping cart is empty